Home

Curb 5.3 Bedford

INTERVIEW WITH PAUL BEDFORD

Excerpt:

In May, Metro Vancouver will hold a referendum on whether or not to raise the sales tax for transportation improvements. If the answer is “no,” warns Bedford, then citizens “better be prepared to live with the increasing consequences of endless road congestion and no new transit.” Since his days on the Metrolinx board, Bedford has stressed that all transportation planning processes need to start with a frank discussion of the “choices and consequences,” informing the public of the trade offs inherent in each decision. Over the years, Bedford has found two questions extremely helpful in guiding this discussion: “What’s in it for me?” and “What’s in it for us – as a society or a city-region?”

When it comes to transportation planning, people want to know what’s in it for them – how exactly their daily life experience will be affected. This involves translating large-scale transit decisions into everyday terms. So, Bedford has crunched the numbers to do just that. According to the CAA Driving Cost Calculator, it costs approximately $12,000/year to own a car in Toronto, which adds up over a 40-year working life, especially if a family happens to have 2 or more cars. But of course this isn’t the only cost, points out Bedford; there’s also the frustration of sitting in gridlock during the average two-hour daily commute.

“I have a great billboard in my imagination that I would love to see erected on highways,” says Bedford, and it would read “‘How would you like ½ million dollars in your RRSP and 3 more years of healthy life?’ Then there would be a number: phone here. That’s very personal—Who wouldn’t make that choice?”

Subscribe to read more.

Advertisements

One thought on “Convergence: Transit Planning for Future Growth

  1. It appears that in his analysis of costs, Bedford likes to “cherry-pick” only those that support his cost analysis (and I do use that term loosely). For example, “three more years of healthy life”??? 1/2 Million dollars in an RRSP ($12,000/yr x 40 yrs) RRSP??? Absolute unsupported dribble!

    Most Canadians do NOT earn sufficient income to create a headroom of $12,000 for an RRSP contribution. Also, there is virtually NO way to determine if a person would live an additional 3 years as he likes to state.

    Then there are cost savings that Mr. Bedford conveniently does NOT take into account…..when calculating the cost of a vehicle, he does not take into account the savings realized by commuting to work by vehicle vs paying bus fare which approximates $160/mo/person.

    For example, for my wife and I, that cost equates to $4,000/year. A car does not cost more to travel with 2 people riding than with one. Bedford does not deduct that saving from his cost analysis. There is also a cost in time-saving. My car leaves the office with only one stop – our house. A bus doesn’t do that.

    Nice try Mr. Bedford, but your estimate is very superficial and one-sided. Incidentally, on the TransLink referendum, our family is a solid NO vote.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s